Phil.UK.Net

Photography | Photography

Page Contents

  • My Photography Background [more]
  • User Impressions And Sample Images [more]
  • Some Books On My Bookshelf [more]
 

 

Thale Noi, Phattalung Province, Thailand

Thale Noi, Phattalung Province, Thailand

 

Social Media

Get the latest updates on this website by following me on Google+

 

Please support this site by sharing content and using the links here to book your hotels. Thank you!

 

Photography

My Photography Background

I received a Canon A1 (plus FD 50mm f/1.8 lens) for my 21st birthday in 1982. I was hooked.

At that time, the technology used in the Canon A1 was almost miraculous. I remember being in awe just thinking what was happening inside the camera.

Over a number of years I added a 70-210mm f/4.0 zoom, a wide angle 28mm f/2.8, a 300mm f/4.0, a 1.4x extender, a 135mm f/2.0, a 500mm f/8.0 mirror lens, flashes, and other bits and pieces.

My last manual focus acquisition (for a safari trip to South Africa) was a Canon T90 - an absolutely remarkable camera.

For my 40th birthday I received a Sony digital point and shoot. This was one of the first digital cameras available, and also my first venture into digital photography. It was expensive and the technology was very basic.

However, I started to get hooked on the convenience of digital.

At the end of 2003, I moved from the UK to Thailand. I took very little with me (deliberately) and deciding what camera gear to take was something of a dilemma.

I took a small laptop, and I didn't want to mess around with negatives and film. I had no desire to use film and then get scans made to import into my computer. In the end I just decided to take the Sony point and shoot, and I left all my film SLR gear in the UK.

The Sony was fine for a while. I started to build other parts of this web site and being able to make my own jpg files was extremely convenient.

However, I soon started to miss having an SLR. The Sony was an autofocus camera but it wasn't possible to select an AF point. I couldn't control the focus or the exposure how I wanted, the long shutter lag started to annoy me, and after a while I started to notice that the image quality wasn't actually that good.

Up until then, digital SLRs had been very expensive but around 2003/2004 they started to drop in price.

I have always been a Canon user and I wanted to keep it that way. At the time, Canon made the 300D and the 10D. The 300D was the right price but it felt like a plastic toy coming from an A1 and T90.

On the other hand, the 10D felt good ... very good. It was more expensive than I wanted to pay but I knew that if I bought a 300D I would regret it later. I bought a 10D and a 17-40mm f/4.0L lens.

It was a great combination.

Again, though, after a while I became a little frustrated with some performance aspects of the 10D. Its buffer could fill quite easily, it was slow doing certain things, and the LCD wasn't great.

The 20D was announced weeks after I bought my 10D and it was too soon to upgrade. The 30D didn't seem to offer much over the 20D, but when I saw the 40D I knew it was time to upgrade.

The 10D was a great start but the 40D fixed all the problems the 10D had. Since then, I've gradually been adding lenses and accessories. The 7D looks to be a very nice camera and I think the extra pixel density will help my macro and telephoto shots of small subjects.

That will probably be my next camera body purchase, unless something better is announced in the meantime.

These pages are simply to write about my impressions of various gear, and to provide sample images where appropriate.

Return to top of page

User Impressions And Sample Images

How useful are lens reviews?

When we make a purchase, we all want to ensure we are buying the best gear for our money. In most cases, different lenses will meet our personal requirements. Often we are not sure which one to go for, so we check forums and read user reviews.

I've been down this path and all it does is confuse me.

I've looked at sample images on pBase taken with the same lens. Some are brilliant, but some are awful.

I've read reviews. For a certain lens (not a cheap one), one reviewer described it as a complete waste of money - the most expensive paperweight he owns. Other reviewers described it as 'tack sharp' and an amazing lens.

Who is right?

A common theme with forum postings and user written reviews is that in most cases there are no image samples to support their claims.

For that reason, I have tried to pay more attention to actual sample images rather than MTF charts, technical specifications, or subjective views. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

By doing this, I hope it will make the lens buying decision a little easier.

Return to top of page

Some Books On My Bookshelf

I like to read in order to get inspiration and ideas from other people. Here are a few books I have picked up along the way.

Some of these books can be downloaded. I own a Kindle but I wouldn't recommend, or consider downloading, any of these titles in e-book format.

With the subject of photography you need to be able to see images as they were intended to be seen by the photographer and the only way to do this is by looking at them printed properly on quality paper.

E-book technology may reach this stage later but for the time being my Kindle hasn't replaced my collection of books, and neither does it threaten to any time soon.

The Studio Photographer's Lighting Bible by Calvey Taylor-Haw

This book isn't quite as authoritative as the title (bible) might suggest, but there are lots of useful tips and it inspires the reader to experiment with different lighting set-ups.

The author draws on many years of real-world experience and talks about business aspects of studio photography as well as the technicalities.

Regarding technical information, there is very little. Most, but not all, image samples have a diagram showing the lighting set-up but the tools of the trade are only referred to generically. For example, snoot, linear strip light, soft box.

For people contemplating setting up their own studio, a buying guide with actual product information would have been useful, along with details of essential and optional equipment.

Photoshop CS5 The Missing Manual by Lesa Snider

I would guess that most people using Photoshop (regardless of the version) probably only use a few percent of its overall capability. I am certainly guilty.

This book is in the appropriately named 'missing manual' series (The book that should have been in the box). It's quite comprehensive and even earns an endorsement from Scott Kelby.

I have discovered things I had no idea about and found out more information about the functions I did know about.

Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3 by Stephen Laskevitch This isn't as comprehensive as the Lesa Snider book, but it covers some different topics and with an application as complex as Photoshop you can't have too many reference books.

I never took to Lightroom. It seems to be a very useful application if you take a lot of photos and need to make the same adjustments to a large batch.

I have never worked that way. I don't take vast numbers of photos and don't work in batches. I work on photos individually and can do I want to do with Bridge, Photoshop, and some Photoshop plug-ins.

Mastering Digital Photography by Michael Freeman.

Michael Freeman is a prolific author.

In this tome he has attempted to cover absolutely everything related to digital photography. It is such a vast subject from start to finish that of course it cannot be done in one book.

As a result, each topic has a very small write up. If you know nothing and want a general overview of a very complex subject it is sufficient.

If you already have some knowledge and require some in-depth knowledge of certain topics, this books falls short most of the time and leaves you wanting more.

It covers too much in too little detail.

The Photographer's Eye by Michael Freeman

Composition is an essential skill for photographers and it is the subject that Michael Freeman covers in detail in this book.

Covering just one subject in depth is, in my opinion, more useful and productive than trying to cover everything, which is my criticism of Michael Freeman's 'Mastering Digital Photography.

It's a useful book and encourages the reader to think. The author discusses different lens focal lengths and gives examples of photos taken of the same scene from different perspectives.

In other examples he provides different crops of the same photo and explains why he chose the crop he did.

Perfect Exposure by Michael Freeman

Michael Freeman concentrates on exposure in this book, as he does on composition in the book above.

Again, discussing one subject in depth is a lot better than trying to cover everything. As he does in the book above, in this one he gives examples of the same scene taken with different exposure settings.

He discusses Ansel Adams' zone system and debates whether it is relevant for today's photography. He concludes that it isn't for digital shooting in colour.

He also discusses the post-processing options we have now for changing the exposure (including HDR), in addition to exposure decisions at the time of capture.

I have found 'Perfect Exposure' and 'The Photographer's Eye' to be far more useful than the same author's 'Mastering Digital Photography'.

Digital Photographer's Handbook by Tom Ang

I picked up a used copy of this book in good condition from a second-hand book shop for very little money. It is a weighty tome that looks professional and it said 'Fully Updated Edition' on the front cover. My mistake was not looking inside to see when it was published.

When I started to read it, some of the advice sounded ancient and the book talks about 'A new era of photography'. I then saw that it was published in 2002.

Digital photography has moved on so much since then, this would be the equivalent of wanting to find out about the latest car technology and picking up a manual for a Ford Model T.

The author has updated this handbook several times and I'm sure that the latest version will be fine. Just don't make the same mistake as me. If you come across any used books on digital photographer make sure you check when they were published.

The technology moves so quickly that anything more than a couple of years old probably won't be of much use, apart from describing the fundamentals of photography that don't really change.

Visit Thailand

Thailand is an incredibly photogenic country, both for its landscapes and its people. Regardless of whether you enjoy large Asian cities, beaches and islands, or rice fields and mountains, Thailand has something for you and it is a dream destination for photographers.

One of the great things about visiting Thailand is that hotels are plentiful and a lot cheaper than in most other countries. I always use Agoda to book hotels in Thailand. The company was established in Thailand and has great local knowledge, as well as a huge inventory of hotels.

If you click on one of the destinations opposite you will get a list of hotel deals from Agoda. It's generally a good idea to book on-line because you will get a good room rate and you won't suffer the disappointment of arriving at a hotel to find that it is full.

I book hotels regularly in Thailand and I have always found Agoda to be the best on-line travel agent. At times I have spent a lot of time researching hotel prices and although other deals sometimes look better at first I always end up returning to Agoda.

If you don't wish to pay for your hotel at the time of booking, Booking.com normally allows you to pay when you check in at the hotel. Some people prefer this method, but I have always found Booking.com to be more expensive than Agoda.

If you want to compare prices between different on-line travel agents (OTAs) for a specific hotel, you can use a company such as HotelsCombined. However, you will normally find that Agoda is the cheapest and therefore you can save yourself time and money by just booking through Agoda in the first place.

 

 

Images of Thailand

Images of Thailand

 

Return to top of page